5 Comments

  1. Posted July 31, 2008 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Can’t help but disagree here guys and if this is a post for a reaction, then… well good on you!

    1. The database is terrible… It doesn’t have my site. My site isn’t that important, but cripes, if the database is bigger than google’s then it should be in there.

    2. The look is a car crash and is unusable… They WILL fold and change it. People don’t scan things in two dimensions - retailers know that consumers review products and prices along a single axis at a time.

    3. Normal uses care not about Google’s privacy policy - only people spending too much time running search campaigns really care :-P

    4. The philosophy is pure icing - it means nothing without implementation (see point two)

    5. Users don’t generally notice it’s advertising so won’t use cuil ‘because there isn’t any’.

  2. ian atkinson
    Posted July 31, 2008 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Hi Jamie,i think Cuil might want to have a rethink about the algorithm which assigns images to listings.

    A quick search for ‘broadband penetration’ amply demonstrates the semantic dissonance between Cuil’s robots and its unsuspecting users (who are at work!!)

    :)

  3. Posted July 31, 2008 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    I have to agree with Adam - I’m incredibly under-enthused by Cuil. So what if it has lovely pictures on the results? Searchsight.com has been doing this for a while.

    Their keyword recognition tools seem very sub-standard as well - I typed in some of the most popular sites (visits and rank) on Google and Cuil failed just about every time.

    Perhaps they’ll grow and improve but on first showing, it’s decidedly uninspiring and “so what”.

  4. Sam
    Posted August 2, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    I cant believe that cuil is still up and running, a terrible search engine that is worst than a school project for retarded kids. Seriously, operators should save what left of their dignities and shut it down, cant they hear the laughing from mountain view?

  5. Tim
    Posted August 8, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    Two things spring to mind.

    1. Brand.

    There has been alot of hype about Cuil. This will draw people to Cuil and creates brand awareness. That in itself is a good thing, and hats off to whoever has been behind creating this hype. I think alot of it comes from the fact the creators are ex Google, but who cares.

    2. Relevancy

    The results I got from doing some of my regular searches, for an early release, to be fair are not that bad. Better than Dogpile or Delicious when they first came out. My only problem is that the way the results are laid out makes me feel like someone has poked me in the eyes with a sharp pencil. A bit of a blur.

    However, bring it on, whether it is good, bad, successful or unsuccessful, we need players like Cuil to move the search market forward. Surely Google cannot be King forever.

One Trackback

  1. [...] and it works better and seems to give better (and more interesting) search results than Cúil (the new search engine kid on the block that claims to have a database many times bigger than Google’s). It even allows you to search [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
« Back to text comment